e third place match was just about as close as a 4-0 sweep can ever be.dddddddddddd Mockit swept Precision Z coming

The Lodha Committee has withdrawn its recommendation to the BCCI to have nominees of two franchises sit on the IPL Governing Council on a rotational basis.The motive behind the recommendation, the Committee had noted in its report, released in January, was to bring more independent voices into the Governing Council. The BCCI, however, had objected, saying having the franchises on the governing council would lead to conflict of interest considering the panel takes influential decisions related to the teams, players and match officials.In its seminal judgement delivered on July 18, the two-judge bench of the Supreme Court had made it binding upon the BCCI to implement virtually all the recommendations laid down by the Lodha Committee to enhance the governance structure both at the board and the state associations.With regards to the proposal to bring in franchises on the IPL Governing Council , the court observed there was evident conflict of interest between the nominees of the IPL franchisees on the one hand and their role as members of the Governing Council on the other.The Lodha Committee had proposed that the IPL Governing Council comprise nine members: three ex-officio members (the BCCI secretary, treasurer, and CEO), two representatives of the members of BCCI to be elected by the General Body, two nominees of the franchises, one nominee who is the Comptroller and Auditor Generals representative on the Apex Council (the proposed body that would replace the Working Committee, the BCCIs highest decision-making body), and one nominee from the players association. It was recommended that the nominees of the franchises rotate annually.In its original report released on January 4, the Lodha Committee had noted that the governance of the IPL left a lot to be desired. The three-member committee, comprising RM Lodha, the former chief justice of the Supreme Court, and justices Ashok Bhan and RV Raveendran, former judges in the Supreme Court, had said the franchise were denied a say in the governance of the league despite being responsible for fostering competition and making revenue.During its meeting on August 28 in Delhi, the Lodha Committee revisited the issue and after deliberations decided to amend the recommendation.The Committee was initially of the view that if a question arose that were to be determined by the IPL Governing Council where the presence of a franchisee nominee would lead to a potential conflict of interest, then a reference could be made under Rule 38 (3) to determine whether the conflict was tractable, in which situation the conflict could be resolved by the recusal of the person concerned, the Committee said in a supplementary report from Sundays meeting.However, when the question of the autonomy and independence within the Governing Council was considered, it was noted that apart from the CEO who is an ex-officio member, the presence of the Players representative and the nominee of the Comptroller & Auditor General would more than satisfy the requirement of the independent oversight within the Governing Council.Therefore, to avoid any complaint or doubt about the presence of franchisees representatives leading to conflict of interest situations, this Committee is of the view that: the recommendation to have Franchisee representatives on the IPL Governing Council be treated as withdrawn.The European Rocket League had its Regional Championships this Sunday to decide the seeding for the International Grand Finals in Amsterdam on Dec. 3. The teams competed for $25,000 and better seeding in the Grand Finals.Match one: Mockit Aces versus Northern GamingIn what was one of the best sets of Rocket League in a long time, Northern Gaming defeated Mockit Aces 4-3 with multiple games going to overtime. Northern Gaming advanced to the Finals to play the winner of FlipSid3 Tactics and Precision Z; Mockit, on the other hand, moved to the third place match versus the other defeated team. This victory is key for Northern, as it seals them into a top two seed for the Grand Finals.Match two: FlipSid3 Tactics versus Precision ZIn the second match of the day, FlipSid3 Tactics dispatched Precision Z in 4-1 fashion. Precision Z were outshot by more than two shots every game, by five in all but one game. Precision Z moved on to face Mockit Aces in the third place match while FlipSid3 moved forward to the finals to play for the number one seed against Northern Gaming.Match three: Precision Z versus Mockit AcesThe third place match was just about as close as a 4-0 sweep can ever be.dddddddddddd Mockit swept Precision Z coming back from two goals behind in three of four games. While the score will forever show a 4-0, Precision Z can be hopeful they squared up against one of the best European teams and kept it close. Expect a real challenge from Precision Z in Amsterdam.Match four: Northern Gaming versus FlipSid3 TacticsFlipSid3 Tactics took the final match of the day and the number one seed from Europe with an incredible 4-0 sweep over Northern Gaming. In what was a very unexpected result, Northern Gaming seemed to have no reply to the incredible offense from FlipSid3. The result wins FlipSid3 a first round matchup against the struggling Take 3 from North America.The next event in RLCS will be the International Grand Finals in early Decemember with the eight best teams in the world facing off. With the seeding decided, the overall ladder for the RLCS Grand Finals in Amsterdam looks like this:1. FlipSid3 Tactics 2. Northern Gaming 3. Mockit Aces 4. Precision Z ' ' '